Firmware
0.0.0
Loading...
Searching...
No Matches
Bug List
Member
decup::Service::socket
(
http::Message
&msg, State decup_state)
should this broadcast Z21 programming mode?
Member
decup::Service::zppSocket
(
http::Message
&msg)
should this broadcast Z21 programming mode?
Member
decup::Service::zsuSocket
(
http::Message
&msg)
should this broadcast Z21 programming mode?
Member
mdu::Service::socket
(
http::Message
&msg, State mdu_state)
should this broadcast Z21 programming mode?
Member
mdu::Service::zppSocket
(
http::Message
&msg)
should this broadcast Z21 programming mode?
Member
mdu::Service::zsuSocket
(
http::Message
&msg)
should this broadcast Z21 programming mode?
Member
ota::Service::Service
(BaseType_t xCoreID)
should this broadcast Z21 programming mode?
{task_function.cpp} Member
out::track::dcc::anonymous_namespace{task_function.cpp}::make_offsets
()
DCC/RailCom timings seem to get worse when the DCC tasks runs the second time?
Member
out::track::get_current_limit
()
currently ignored... should be 500mA for DCC serv, MDU and DECUP, user setting for DCC op
Member
z21::Service::socket
(
http::Message
&msg)
if the socket cloases for any reason we're fucked, there must be some way to detect such cases and restart the socket in the Frontend?
Member
zusi::Service::socket
(
http::Message
&msg)
should this broadcast Z21 programming mode?
Firmware 0.0.0